Author Topic: star trek  (Read 381964 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3000 on: May 19, 2020, 08:15:28 PM »
I like Picard.

I don't.

I'm sorry cindi, we have to kill each other now.

Alright.

IYKYK

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
dog

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3002 on: May 20, 2020, 01:30:19 AM »
This bodysnatchers episode of DS9 is unbelievably bad :lol

Which season? I’m finally up to season 3 now.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3003 on: May 20, 2020, 01:39:42 AM »
I'll just guess season two, "Invasive Procedures", where the trill dude tries to steal Dax?

That means "Cardassians" would be next up on shosta network. Garak episode. :hyper

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3004 on: May 20, 2020, 01:43:20 AM »
The backhalf of season two really starts to ramp up a lot of the arcs that'll be for the rest of the series. Not just The Dominion, but the Maquis, etc.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3005 on: May 20, 2020, 01:46:53 AM »
Bashir takes a while... they really didn't know what to do with the character and it shows.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3006 on: May 20, 2020, 02:57:05 AM »
Quote
Rules of Acquisition is one of my favorite episodes. All of the Ferengi episodes are good. All of them.

My man :bow

Trekkies HATE those episodes and all I can scream is WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?!
IYKYK

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3007 on: May 20, 2020, 07:22:47 AM »
I think you'd be hard pressed to find trekkies who hate the ds9 ferengi episodes...
What

Coffee Dog

  • Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3008 on: May 20, 2020, 09:00:09 AM »
Yeah, while I'm sure there are people who don't appreciate their sheer volume the ferengi stuff generally makes for a really good hour of tv.

DS9  :heartbeat

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #3009 on: May 20, 2020, 09:07:43 AM »
Keeping Up with the Cardassians
dog

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3010 on: May 20, 2020, 10:06:38 AM »
I think you'd be hard pressed to find trekkies who hate the ds9 ferengi episodes...

Are you fucking kidding me? It's so common to find people who hate them. Usually if you like them you tend to stick out.
IYKYK

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3011 on: May 20, 2020, 10:53:25 AM »
:confused

there are some real duffers in ferengi episodes, but theres also some real highlights, including the iggy muhfucking pop cameo in the magnificent seven ep.

its not like Lwaxana Troi episodes


GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3013 on: May 20, 2020, 11:22:38 AM »
Even those links are why "why do some people hate them?" and a bunch of people saying they don't :confused

Its not like beverly crusher getting fucked by a ghost, which is near universally reviled as fucking awful trash

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3014 on: May 20, 2020, 11:29:41 AM »
Sub Rosa was so goddamn awful.  :yuck

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3015 on: May 20, 2020, 11:37:34 AM »
DS9 Whispers was OK in my book. There's another dark O'Brien episode that is not so removed from that (and another, lighter one) and the conga line effect of trauma cheapens them all a bit.

Bashir gets better. Then reverts to bad in the tail end of the show but at least you have more sympathy for him by that point.
ὕβρις

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3016 on: May 20, 2020, 11:44:14 AM »
spoiler (click to show/hide)
remember when ds9 makes a point (a very good one btw) for sisko not to go to club because back then black people wouldn't be allowed to go? And then Miles and Bashir end the series DEFENDING the battle of the Alamo? Texans were fighting to have slaves lol.
[close]
IYKYK

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3017 on: May 20, 2020, 11:48:19 AM »
I like when Bashir and O'Brien cure space aids and the government tries to have them murdered and she's all "My husband NEVER drinks coffee after midday!" and at the end he's all "what? I drink that shit all day long" :rofl

Relevant.
ὕβρις

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #3018 on: May 20, 2020, 11:48:31 AM »
Its not like beverly crusher getting fucked by a ghost, which is near universally reviled as fucking awful trash

WTF?  :lol

Quote
Dr. Crusher attends her grandmother's funeral, and spends time in her grandmother's haunted house, romanced by her grandmother's non-corporeal lover.

 :whatisthis

Quote
At the cemetery, Geordi and Data have found an energy source in Beverly's grandmother's grave. They open the grave, and the grandmother rises and attacks them. Beverly arrives and orders Ronin to get out of her grandmother's body. Ronin does so and tells Beverly to give him the candle. She has by now discovered that he is an anaphasic alien who can only survive because the plasma-based candle is his energy receptacle. Beverly destroys the candle with a phaser and vaporizes Ronin when he attempts to possess her body.

 :titus
ど助平

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3019 on: May 20, 2020, 11:58:06 AM »
Its not like beverly crusher getting fucked by a ghost, which is near universally reviled as fucking awful trash

WTF?  :lol

Quote
Dr. Crusher attends her grandmother's funeral, and spends time in her grandmother's haunted house, romanced by her grandmother's non-corporeal lover.

 :whatisthis

Quote
At the cemetery, Geordi and Data have found an energy source in Beverly's grandmother's grave. They open the grave, and the grandmother rises and attacks them. Beverly arrives and orders Ronin to get out of her grandmother's body. Ronin does so and tells Beverly to give him the candle. She has by now discovered that he is an anaphasic alien who can only survive because the plasma-based candle is his energy receptacle. Beverly destroys the candle with a phaser and vaporizes Ronin when he attempts to possess her body.

 :titus
Remember in Saved by the Bell when Jesse developed an addiction to caffeine pills and has that big “druggie freak out”?  Watching Sub Rosa is similar levels of embarrassment-by-proxy when you watch it.

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3020 on: May 20, 2020, 11:58:44 AM »
 :ryker

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3021 on: May 20, 2020, 12:01:27 PM »
Bashir starts off as horny frat boy, and then becomes IRL bond ??? because he has a british accent ??? and enjoys grey market Bond knock off holodeck novels ???

O'Brieshir bromance saves the character though

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3022 on: May 20, 2020, 12:02:05 PM »
bork the Trek virgin :uguu

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3023 on: May 20, 2020, 12:19:28 PM »
the clock is now ticking till bork starts taking gold pressed latinum bribes for forum favours  :quark

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3024 on: May 20, 2020, 12:31:42 PM »
Bashir starts off as horny frat boy, and then becomes IRL bond ??? because he has a british accent ??? and enjoys grey market Bond knock off holodeck novels ???

Bashir is cool because of the whole
spoiler (click to show/hide)
genetic modified super human/intelligence thing. I really enjoy his dedication to his patients. I'd trust him over any other doctor in the series besides EMH. You're forgetting the episodes where he tries to help his fellow genetic modified folks. Those were always good
[close]

Find it weird you remember the Bond stuff (I don't) but don't remember a crucial part of his character.
IYKYK

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3025 on: May 20, 2020, 01:37:23 PM »
Bashirs fascination with Garak comes from his spyfic interests, and Garaks amusement at him comes from the discrepancy between what Bashir thinks spycraft is about and what it actually involves, and his later
spoiler (click to show/hide)
involvement with Sloane and Section 13 is entirely down to Sloane manipulating him based on those same preconceptions - and you could say he was picked because of his genetic engineering, but it's pretty clear when he is 'recruited' part of the plan is that he would fuck it up and go off plan because he thinks he's James Bond.

In actuality, both Sisko and O'Brien show better tradecraft, with Siskos cointelpro and O'Briens undercover / infiltration gig later on.

The genetic engineering stuff never really comes up outside of those couple of eps with the starfleet braintrust, and it sort of undermines his character that being part of it, as instead of just a smart dude who became a doctor, he's a genius level intellect slumming it as some kind of underachieving dilettante. Like, when he's embarrassed when an alumni is coming to visit, because their career is going so much better than his, and they don't have supersoldier serum to account for it.
[close]

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3026 on: May 20, 2020, 01:41:28 PM »
Quote
Bashirs fascination with Garak comes from his spyfic interests, and Garaks amusement at him comes from the discrepancy between what Bashir thinks spycraft is about and what it actually involves

This is a fan head canon.

It's garak that inserts his way into a relationship, not the other way around. Bashir is sitting, eating his lunch and then Garak comes pushing his way into his space.

His engineering is more central to his character imo. I never got any spy crap from Bashir outside of his holodeck trips. On the contrary, Miles is the spy.
IYKYK

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3027 on: May 20, 2020, 01:43:46 PM »
I haven't rewatched recently, but its super early on that he goes to Sisko "I think that tailor might be a SPY I'm going to get closer to him" and sisko is all "whatevs doctor"

:idont

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3028 on: May 20, 2020, 01:47:08 PM »
I haven't rewatched recently, but its super early on that he goes to Sisko "I think that tailor might be a SPY I'm going to get closer to him" and sisko is all "whatevs doctor"

:idont

He thinks Garak might be a spy. True. This doesn't make it conclusive that Bashir himself has a fascination with spying or considers himself to be James Bond, which is your main point and something I've never seen an inkling regarding the character.
IYKYK

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #3029 on: May 20, 2020, 01:50:52 PM »
Remember in Saved by the Bell when Jesse developed an addiction to caffeine pills and has that big “druggie freak out”?  Watching Sub Rosa is similar levels of embarrassment-by-proxy when you watch it.

I think I'm going to have to watch this episode now.   :lol

bork the Trek virgin :uguu

Yeah man, outside of some original series stuff, some TNG episodes, and the movies...I don't really know what's going on with it.  Every time I find out about some weird or crazy shit, I have to check it out.  :P  Last time I went hunting for an episode or two was after finding out that Ryker had a clone or whatever who ended up doing his own thing.
:ryker :ryker

the clock is now ticking till bork starts taking gold pressed latinum bribes for forum favours  :quark

:confused
ど助平

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3030 on: May 20, 2020, 01:58:53 PM »
He thinks Garak might be a spy. True. This doesn't make it conclusive that Bashir himself has a fascination with spying or considers himself to be James Bond, which is your main point and something I've never seen an inkling regarding the character.

His motivations are part of what makes his character; why is he taken with the idea that there might be a spy? It's not for professional reasons, that's Odos job. So it is for personal reasons.
And over the course of the show him being into spyfic stuff is explicitly laid out, culminating in his involvement with you know who.

Also FWIW I think Dr Phlox is best Trek Doctor (and Andy Dick is worst  :yuck) in being the doctor I would most want to be treated by if I had something wrong

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3031 on: May 20, 2020, 02:13:32 PM »
Remember in Saved by the Bell when Jesse developed an addiction to caffeine pills and has that big “druggie freak out”?  Watching Sub Rosa is similar levels of embarrassment-by-proxy when you watch it.

I think I'm going to have to watch this episode now.   :lol

bork the Trek virgin :uguu

Yeah man, outside of some original series stuff, some TNG episodes, and the movies...I don't really know what's going on with it.  Every time I find out about some weird or crazy shit, I have to check it out.  :P  Last time I went hunting for an episode or two was after finding out that Ryker had a clone or whatever who ended up doing his own thing.
 :ryker :ryker

the clock is now ticking till bork starts taking gold pressed latinum bribes for forum favours  :quark

 :confused
it will be very profitable for us both  :money

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #3032 on: May 20, 2020, 02:22:40 PM »
Also FWIW I think Dr Phlox is best Trek Doctor (and Andy Dick is worst  :yuck) in being the doctor I would most want to be treated by if I had something wrong

Andy Dick was on Star Trek!?



:mindblown :dead
ど助平

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3033 on: May 20, 2020, 02:34:08 PM »
Someone break out the Star Trek guest star list for bork  :cornette

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3034 on: May 20, 2020, 02:42:19 PM »
Seven of Nine smells what The Rock is cooking in an intergalactic cage match
Sarah Silverman drives a shitty campervan
Steven Hawking plays poker
Iggy Pop is a deadpan middle manager in a totalitarian regime
Frasier is caught in a timeloop

...that's all I got :trumps

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3035 on: May 20, 2020, 03:27:34 PM »
Ashley Judd was wet for Wesley.

There’s more Jeffrey Combs characters than there are red shirts.

Wallace Shawn is conceivably the most powerful Ferengi.



Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #3036 on: May 20, 2020, 04:18:36 PM »


David Warner the GOAT :rejoice
dog

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3037 on: May 20, 2020, 04:52:33 PM »
there's loads of "oh hey it's that guy" type cameos from Max Headroom through Paulie from Goodfellas (and an early kirsten dunst) but I was thinking mkore famous in their own regard before cameoing type cameos :idont

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3038 on: May 20, 2020, 07:51:53 PM »
https://www.startrek.com/news/the-humbling-of-admiral-picard

Mother Fuck this show and anybody who worked on it.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
And anybody who likes it.
[close]

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3039 on: May 20, 2020, 08:43:54 PM »
I watched the much discussed Plinkett review which was more a 'Mike review'.

I understand where he is coming from but this outcome was expected. He says there's a bigger audience for old school Star Trek but I highly doubt that.
As far as I remember from the mid to late 90's Star Trek was the show that families watched together on the living room TV.  You could miss half of it and the stations would just repeat episodes and didn't give a fuck.
People liked it because it was better than most TV shows, it wasn't violent so no one really objected watching it and especially later on it filled airtime between bigger prime time shows.
My dad like the science, my older brother the stories and as a kid I just thought it was cool with the space ships, computers, aliens and all. Mom was just glad we all sat down and weren't fighting over some dumb shit.

Fans simply got lucky that it was made and written as well as it was. TV shows were sort of seen as B-entertainment while the A-list actors would do movies.
There was a clear distinction between 'lesser' TV actors and well paid movie stars. After all TV content was basically there to get people hooked to watch the commercials.
Over time they discovered they could do that easier and cheaper with reality TV and repeating the same formats. Something that took quite some time and skill to create like Star Trek wasn't necessary.

The entire entertainment world has flipped upside down. Shows on streaming services (i.e. content) is where the money is and millions of dollars are spend on research to figure out what the audience wants.
And unfortunately for Mike, today's' audience isn't the family that sits down after a week of school and work to watch Star Trek together. Instead they target the people that consume a lot of this type of entertainment.
Currently the hot shit is Marvel and character drama. Add in some modern day angst and you have Picard. They sort of bet that fans will watch it anyway (to see if it is a trainwreck or not) and then they move on to reel in the rest.
A cool guy with a sword for the boys, a few 'empowered' women for the ladies etc. plus everyone can watch it on their own personal phone/tablet/PC/TV. Even if mom and dad don't like it, it doesn't matter because the kids probably will.
There's no longer one screen in the house and it just becomes part of a growing 'compelling content library'.

Do the creators care about butchering the lore, characters and everything else?
Nope, because Star Trek is an IP, a universe they can take inspiration from and that has name recognition.
They can break, change and rewrite whatever they want. No one except a few hardcore fans like Mike are going to remember the character traits of Picard or his relationship with Data.
Some people might notice that Star Trek has gotten more violent and dark (but what hasn't?) but that's about it.
🤴

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3040 on: May 20, 2020, 09:37:18 PM »
https://www.startrek.com/news/the-humbling-of-admiral-picard

Mother Fuck this show and anybody who worked on it.

Quote
Number One the dog represents a marginalized community


Quote
Ruth is a black/Latinx freelancer based in Istanbul who writes about culture, travel, and wellness. She still hasn't finished all of DS9.
:mike

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3041 on: May 20, 2020, 09:51:42 PM »
I understand where he is coming from but this outcome was expected. He says there's a bigger audience for old school Star Trek but I highly doubt that.

The problem with this assertion, is it's just assumed to be true because nobodies making that kind of show (except for the Orville, which was pretty much critically panned but was still getting decent ratings).

If you want darker, violent, highly serialized scifi there's literally dozens of options available to watch and stream right now.
And stuff like WestWorld  is waaaaaaaaaay fucking better than Picard is.
You can see episodic TV still exists and is still successful in other genres - shit, the procedural has this down to a fine art by now with your mid season and whole season arcs but syndication friendly episodic format - and there's still a spread in tone between like, a Criminal Minds, an SVU or a Lethal Weapon.

What Star Trek had was a unique selling point; it had its own niche. What it is now is directly competing with your Expanses and your WestWorlds, and frankly, it needs to seriously up its writing game if it wants people to buy a CBS sub over an Amazon or HBO.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3042 on: May 21, 2020, 01:22:55 AM »
stuff like WestWorld  is waaaaaaaaaay fucking better than Picard is.
I really hate Picard, but let's not go wild  :cenk

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3043 on: May 21, 2020, 06:00:15 AM »
I understand where he is coming from but this outcome was expected. He says there's a bigger audience for old school Star Trek but I highly doubt that.

The problem with this assertion, is it's just assumed to be true because nobodies making that kind of show (except for the Orville, which was pretty much critically panned but was still getting decent ratings).

If you want darker, violent, highly serialized scifi there's literally dozens of options available to watch and stream right now.
And stuff like WestWorld  is waaaaaaaaaay fucking better than Picard is.
You can see episodic TV still exists and is still successful in other genres - shit, the procedural has this down to a fine art by now with your mid season and whole season arcs but syndication friendly episodic format - and there's still a spread in tone between like, a Criminal Minds, an SVU or a Lethal Weapon.

What Star Trek had was a unique selling point; it had its own niche. What it is now is directly competing with your Expanses and your WestWorlds, and frankly, it needs to seriously up its writing game if it wants people to buy a CBS sub over an Amazon or HBO.
I think the issue is the combination of the setting and type of show.
Shows set in current times or history have the problem solving and relationship arcs. Because that's what the target audience wants to see and expects.
I would say a good example are the earlier seasons of Game of Thrones minus the cheap violence and softcore porn it was just about the character interactions, problem solving, politics etc. .
That also changed in later seasons because the audience responded really well to the big fights, doomsday plot and over the top violence. The production values went up, the writing took a dive.

Sci-fi set in space across the board is more action or more thriller focused and when a movie comes out that doesn't do that, people hop online to complain that it is 'boring' and 'dull'. 
I think we're finally seeing a shift in that with the audience rejecting an action packed roller coaster Star Wars and instead preferring the Mandalorian instead.
Still, the largest chunk of the audience wants to see action, just look at what's trending on Netflix daily. It's usually the latest Originals action flick they just dropped.
I think a good example is Blade Runner, it was assumed that because the original had built up a cult following a sequel would be a big hit and the IP would finally get the attention it deserved. Instead it flopped.
Not to mention this show is also for modern audiences that liked the J.J. Abrams movies. Because that was so successful it sorta became the template for bringing back old IP's.
It is going to be interesting to see what the Dune reboot is going to be like.

As for the writing of Star Strek, they sort of copy pasted the plot from Mass Effect and did it poorly so yeah these people are talentless hacks.  :doge

Who knows maybe if they went with the 1 story = 1 episode structure it might've been praised like The Mandalorian for being 'different' but that would've been a big risk compared to creating a long action packed Star Trek movie
starring Patrick Stewart based on the plot of Mass Effect.
🤴

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3044 on: May 21, 2020, 12:27:18 PM »
stuff like WestWorld  is waaaaaaaaaay fucking better than Picard is.
I really hate Picard, but let's not go wild  :cenk

Yeah the WestWorld comparisons made me do the collar-grab/grimacing thing. "Mike wat are you doing"

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3045 on: May 21, 2020, 12:29:12 PM »
But they've now announced that the new Captain Pike series is going to be lighter in tone and more episodic, so I dunno if fling shit at wall and hope it sticks is an ongoing strategy as they churn through showrunners and keep announcing new spin offs, if the direction they've taken with discovery and Picard is actually generating business and CBS subs and validating their strategy, or if their continuing resistance to giving the fans what they've been clamouring for actually does just boil down to


:idont

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3046 on: May 21, 2020, 12:31:06 PM »
I really liked WestWorld S1 and S2, I haven't seen S3 yet.
Compare Picard S1 to WestWorld S1 - both a highly serialised reboot of an existing property. Which would you rather sign up to a service to subscribe to after watching the first couple of episodes?

:trumps

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3047 on: May 21, 2020, 01:26:51 PM »
So what are our hopes for the planned Section 31 show?  For me, I want the actions of their lead protagonist(s) to be fatalist and grimy (kind of like how Vic Mackey does his job, but with less selfishness), but tonally contrasted by constantly presenting us the utopian veneer of Starfleet and the Federation.  Things like brutal assassinations of diplomats and their families against propaganda level backdrops of Starfleet as benevolent caretakers, research into biological warfare to be used against allied races like the Vulcans and Klingons, in the event they become “existential threats” to the good of the Federation. Shit like that.
« Last Edit: May 21, 2020, 01:31:39 PM by Tuckers Law »

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3048 on: May 21, 2020, 01:38:24 PM »
I have no idea to expect from it. I figure it could be a procedural like Law and Order. IDK.
IYKYK

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: star trek
« Reply #3049 on: May 21, 2020, 01:45:46 PM »
I like Q

this goes in the hungrynoob thread

BIONIC

  • Virgo. Live Music. The Office. Tacos. Fur mom. True crime junkie. INTJ.
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3050 on: May 21, 2020, 01:50:27 PM »
Margs

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3051 on: May 21, 2020, 01:54:53 PM »
Westworld season 1 is fine but 2 and 3 are star wars tier  :nope

stufte

  • Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3052 on: May 21, 2020, 01:55:31 PM »
Picard was barely a Star Trek show. It was generic space drama pew pew with a veneer of Star Trek. Both this and Discovery are embarrassingly vapid "Star Trek" shows.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3053 on: May 21, 2020, 02:08:42 PM »
Who is the massive fa.ggot that merged my thread with this thread?
IYKYK

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3054 on: May 21, 2020, 02:12:14 PM »
So what are our hopes for the planned Section 31 show?  For me, I want the actions of their lead protagonist(s) to be fatalist and grimy (kind of like how Vic Mackey does his job, but with less selfishness), but tonally contrasted by constantly presenting us the utopian veneer of Starfleet and the Federation.  Things like brutal assassinations of diplomats and their families against propaganda level backdrops of Starfleet as benevolent caretakers, research into biological warfare to be used against allied races like the Vulcans and Klingons, in the event they become “existential threats” to the good of the Federation. Shit like that.

Which would be great, but they've already kind of handicapped themselves on that front by making it a crapsack universe where starfleet are already morally compromised, so they can't pull a Demolition Man where nobody expects federation members to act like that because they already do anyway.

The ideal show would be something like the OG Mission Impossible TV show, where they're doing shit like pulling long con mindops on people, like that ep of DS9 where they kidnap Kira and gaslight her into thinking she's a Cardassian to try and smoke out a high ranking Cardassian traitor by making him think she's his daughter.
Realistically my expectations are set at the Mission Impossible films, where there is a nominal plot, but its just action setpieces and gadgets.

Michelle Yeoh is great though, so I'm sure her hamming it up as undercover Rita Repulsa will be entertaining regardless of what she has to work with.

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3055 on: May 21, 2020, 02:17:05 PM »
Thread merges and closing threads like the skyler one because someone doesn’t like them, this place is a fucking prison on planet bullshit!  :rage. All mods are cops

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3056 on: May 21, 2020, 02:19:15 PM »
Thread merges and closing threads like the skyler one because someone doesn’t like them, this place is a fucking prison on planet bullshit!  :rage. All mods are cops

Indeed. Who is doing this shit.
IYKYK

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3057 on: May 21, 2020, 02:25:23 PM »
But they've now announced that the new Captain Pike series is going to be lighter in tone and more episodic, so I dunno if fling shit at wall and hope it sticks is an ongoing strategy as they churn through showrunners and keep announcing new spin offs, if the direction they've taken with discovery and Picard is actually generating business and CBS subs and validating their strategy, or if their continuing resistance to giving the fans what they've been clamouring for actually does just boil down to
(Image removed from quote.)

:idont

Captain Pike was pretty inoffensive but Spork was. :trigger

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #3058 on: May 21, 2020, 02:28:03 PM »
Who is the massive fa.ggot that merged my thread with this thread?

Your entire thread wasn't merged with this one.  Just the few posts made today.  I thought Tuckers Law bumped the wrong thread and figured I'd help.   APOLOGIES FOR SUCH A MASSIVE ABUSE OF POWER AND DISRUPTION.  ::)

What the fuck is with the hostility in this thread?
« Last Edit: May 21, 2020, 02:32:26 PM by bork »
ど助平

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3059 on: May 21, 2020, 02:31:05 PM »
I actually forgot new Spock existed till now. Michelle Yeoh was about the only thing from new trek that didn't feel like swallowing twice regurgitated vomit.