The moment before it's born, you'd have no problem with killing a goddamn baby?
Trust me, plenty of people find your views on abortion reprehensible as well.
Sure, but that doesn't mean anything without some kind of thoughtful argument. What's a reasonable argument anyone could actually make against my position?
It's just an extension of the position on what we consider a life worth protecting. A newborn baby has less capabilities (be it emotion, intelligence or whatever traits one considers significant to be worth protecting) than other species we have to problem killing by the millions. Sure it is likely to develop those capabilities, but the same could be said about a fetus in the 12 week of pregnancy.
I don't take that position at all, and it's a position that almost anyone would repulse but if you're thinking about it purely from a "when has a being the traits that we consider human, that we consider has a definitive right to life" pov than it's not easy to differentiate between a fetus 12 or 34 weeks into pregnancy, a newborn or even a baby that is a couple of months old. We can differ between them, we can set different points at which a fetus or a baby has maybe more capabilities to feel pain or are "more human like" but if we don't apply special rules for beings that belong to the human race, we would have to treat other species much different if we want to act ethically consistant.
