Author Topic: US Politics Thread |OT| THE DARKEST TIMELINE  (Read 2656148 times)

0 Members and 33 Guests are viewing this topic.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16980 on: June 12, 2016, 08:39:55 AM »
Not sure I've ever heard a conservative give a decent response to the simple "so why did Strom and other dixiecrats leave the democrat party and join the republican party after the CRA passed?" question. And why did the south go from a democrat stronghold to a republican stronghold? And what was Nixon's "law and order" all about?
Thing is Strom Thurmond was the only one who did change parties. Most of the swaps like Phil Gramm, Richard Shelby, etc. all were elected in the late 1970s/early 1980s.

And the South's status as a GOP stronghold has been oversold by focus on the Presidency and may be running out of steam. The GOP wasn't even a viable party in the South until the 1980's, and didn't start controlling state houses until the 2000s.

I think general Social Conservatism/Religious Right Rise/etc. explains as much, if not more than trickle-down racism. The northern Reagan Democrats abandoned at about the same time because of the McGovern-Mondale-Jackson "hard-left" swing of the Democrats outside of History's Greatest Monster.

"Law and order" was definitely a coded statement about the race riots, that's the entire reason Agnew got on the ticket despite being a Rockefeller Republican, he stood up against the black establishment in Maryland so he became acceptable in the South even though he was easily less conservative than Nixon.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16981 on: June 12, 2016, 08:40:10 AM »
Not sure I've ever heard a conservative give a decent response to the simple "so why did Strom and other dixiecrats leave the democrat party and join the republican party after the CRA passed?" question. And why did the south go from a democrat stronghold to a republican stronghold? And what was Nixon's "law and order" all about?
Thing is Strom Thurmond was the only one who did change parties. Most of the swaps like Phil Gramm, Richard Shelby, etc. all were elected in the late 1970s/early 1980s.

And the South's status as a GOP stronghold has been oversold by focus on the Presidency and may be running out of steam. The GOP wasn't even a viable party in the South until the 1980's, and didn't start controlling state houses until the 2000s.

I think general Social Conservatism/Religious Right Rise/etc. explains as much, if not more than trickle-down racism. The northern Reagan Democrats abandoned at about the same time because of the McGovern-Mondale-Jackson "hard-left" swing of the Democrats outside of History's Greatest Monster.

"Law and order" was definitely a coded statement about the race riots, that's the entire reason Agnew got on the ticket despite being a Rockefeller Republican, he stood up against the black establishment in Maryland so he became acceptable in the South even though he was easily less conservative than Nixon.
:paul

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16982 on: June 12, 2016, 08:40:49 AM »
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/tulsi-gabbard-superdelegate-petition-224220
Quote
The Democratic presidential primary process may be ending next Tuesday, but the fight among Bernie Sanders supporters to rid the party of superdelegates and install new leadership at the Democratic National Committee is not.

Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard encouraged her followers on Saturday to sign a petition ending the Democratic Party’s use of superdelegates.

“Whether you are a Bernie Sanders supporter or a Hillary Clinton supporter, we should all agree that unelected party officials and lobbyists should not have a say in who the presidential nominee of our party is,” she wrote in a Facebook post. “That should be left up to the voters.”

Gabbard resigned as a vice chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee in February to publicly endorse the Vermont senator’s campaign.

Gabbard isn’t alone in the fight: The West Virginia Democratic Party at its state convention Saturday passed a resolution calling for the elimination of superdelegates, or that superdelegates be required “in each state to vote in the same relative proportion as the elected delegates of the state they represent.”

Sanders defeated Clinton in the May 10 West Virginia Democratic primary, 51.4 percent to 35.8 percent. He picked up 18 delegates; Clinton picked up 11, according to the Associated Press.

The party also passed a resolution calling for the resignation of DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

“… If she does not resign in a timely manner, we call on the Democratic National Committee [to] take whatever steps are necessary and proper to remove her and install a new Chairperson,” the resolution reads.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16983 on: June 12, 2016, 12:13:28 PM »
I think general Social Conservatism/Religious Right Rise/etc. explains as much, if not more than trickle-down racism.

nah

I'm a Puppy!

  • Knows the muffin man.
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16984 on: June 12, 2016, 01:45:20 PM »
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/742034549232766976

At this point I'd be worried that someone is just going to take it on themselves to "deal" with Trump. You can't piss so many people off so often.
que

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16985 on: June 12, 2016, 01:53:36 PM »
If he becomes a Republican martyr before being slaughtered by Hillary, that would be very, very bad for this country.

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16986 on: June 12, 2016, 07:11:21 PM »
Can we please just keep Obama please
püp

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16987 on: June 12, 2016, 07:11:56 PM »
http://www.sltrib.com/news/3993058-155/poll-trumps-unpopularity-could-swing-utahns

Quote
Donald Trump's brash swagger and outlandish behavior have made him so unpopular in Utah that a new poll shows the state could swing to Hillary Clinton in November, potentially becoming the first time in 52 years that a Democrat has won the Beehive State.

Clinton and Trump are knotted at 35 percent, with five months of campaigning remaining before the election, according to the survey conducted for The Salt Lake Tribune and the Hinckley Institute of Politics at the University of Utah.

Libertarian Party nominee Gary Johnson draws 13 percent, a remarkably strong showing for the candidate who garnered 1.2 percent as the party's candidate four years ago.

Quote
The_Unbeliever • 19 hours ago
That it's not a landslide for Hillary tells me everything I need to know about Utah. I was in the waiting room of a car repair shop the other day and listened to a man tell me that he knew for a fact Hillary is going to prison because of Benghazi, another informed me that people work for minimum wage because they are too lazy to better themselves. It seems to me that often the more Christian someone says they are, the less Christian they act and sometimes the more stupid they seem.
31  • Reply•Share ›

curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16988 on: June 12, 2016, 08:14:49 PM »

HyperZoneWasAwesome

  • HastilyChosenUsername
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16989 on: June 13, 2016, 02:41:35 AM »
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/742034549232766976

At this point I'd be worried that someone is just going to take it on themselves to "deal" with Trump. You can't piss so many people off so often.
two things have surprised me about Trump so far...

#1 that he hasn't yet dropped a full-on slur into a hot mike
#2 that he hasn't yet received a serious attempt on his life

I fully agree. I even kind of think if in the unlikely event that brought him to the presidency, that he wouldn't last long before somebody frags his ass. Hate breeds hate, and if the Secret Service can't be arsed to keep the first black president completely safe, I fail to see how they defend the orange rage magnet against any one out of millions of people he's antagonizing who decides they have nothing else to lose.

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16990 on: June 13, 2016, 04:34:09 AM »
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/742034549232766976

At this point I'd be worried that someone is just going to take it on themselves to "deal" with Trump. You can't piss so many people off so often.
two things have surprised me about Trump so far...

#1 that he hasn't yet dropped a full-on slur into a hot mike
#2 that he hasn't yet received a serious attempt on his life

I fully agree. I even kind of think if in the unlikely event that brought him to the presidency, that he wouldn't last long before somebody frags his ass. Hate breeds hate, and if the Secret Service can't be arsed to keep the first black president completely safe, I fail to see how they defend the orange rage magnet against any one out of millions of people he's antagonizing who decides they have nothing else to lose.
I keep wondering if they'll have something like Olympus Has Fallen, but we're all rooting for Rick Yune or Dylan McDermott.

Am_I_Anonymous

  • And I'm pretty sure fuck you (italics implied)
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16991 on: June 13, 2016, 11:23:19 AM »
Bernie Sanders making John Edwards seem fair and balanced  :doge
YMMV

Am_I_Anonymous

  • And I'm pretty sure fuck you (italics implied)
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16992 on: June 13, 2016, 11:24:01 AM »
I hope this election brings out more pictures of vintage Hillary.

(Image removed from quote.)

 :mouf

Which one is she in that pic?
YMMV

seagrams hotsauce

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16993 on: June 13, 2016, 06:29:14 PM »
Bernie Sanders making John Edwards seem fair and balanced  :doge

:confused

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16994 on: June 13, 2016, 07:39:09 PM »
Did a quick search and still not sure what AiA is referring to. :yeshrug
Hi

Human Snorenado

  • Stay out of Malibu, Lebowski
  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16995 on: June 13, 2016, 07:42:58 PM »
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/trump-chris-christie-manservant-mcdonalds

Quote
“[Christie] has transformed himself into a sort of manservant, who is constantly with Trump at events,” Ryan Lizza wrote in the magazine’s June 20 issue. Lizza also said one anonymous Republican source told him a friend on Trump’s campaign “used Snapchat to send him a video of Christie fetching Trump’s McDonald’s order.”

yar

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16996 on: June 13, 2016, 07:43:51 PM »
:neogaf
dog

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
©@©™

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16998 on: June 13, 2016, 11:00:11 PM »
Wow I'm so surprised that he's previously banned Univision. :hitler
Hi

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #16999 on: June 14, 2016, 12:32:38 AM »
Remember a few weeks ago when people were seriously suggesting that Trump was going to settle down and start acting more Presidential with the GOP nomination finally locked up? :neogaf
dog

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17000 on: June 14, 2016, 10:34:00 AM »
He couldn't even sit back and watch the terrorist attack play out in his favor. Maybe just give his condolences, affirm he's going to destroy ISIS, mention now is again the time to ban Muslim immigration, etc. Instead he congratulated himself, accused Obama of being a terrorist, and made one of the worst foreign policy speeches ever. Oh and he yanked the WaPo's press pass thus making it a story. :lol

010

Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17001 on: June 14, 2016, 01:49:39 PM »
https://twitter.com/benchmarkpol/status/742707788858679296

Trump has made Utah a battleground state, brehs


Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17002 on: June 14, 2016, 02:01:32 PM »
Trump gonna get BTFO in November and I'll have this face the entire time: :aah

helios

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17003 on: June 14, 2016, 04:19:03 PM »



mormapope

  • WHADDYA HEAR, WHADDYA SAY
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17004 on: June 14, 2016, 04:47:54 PM »
Anderson Cooper roasted her in the most professional and intelligent way possible
OH!

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17005 on: June 14, 2016, 05:59:54 PM »
https://twitter.com/benchmarkpol/status/742707788858679296

Trump has made Utah a battleground state, brehs

Probably because of how hard he fights for the LGBT community.

©@©™

zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17006 on: June 14, 2016, 07:00:27 PM »
Big Trump Tent
rub

Atramental

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17007 on: June 14, 2016, 07:02:26 PM »
Big Trump Tent
Which also happens to be an extra pair of Chris Christie's pants.  :doge

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
010

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17009 on: June 14, 2016, 08:05:16 PM »
It's nice to know that public service will always be a viable career path for me. :hitler

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17010 on: June 14, 2016, 09:51:11 PM »


:mindblown

edit: I should clarify yea a lot of stealing was going on but that's not something you say as a presidential candidate
« Last Edit: June 14, 2016, 09:59:25 PM by Phoenix Dark »
010

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17012 on: June 14, 2016, 11:55:31 PM »
Seriously had it with the gun nuts on Facebook. Buh buh semi auto! Like shit like this isn't around to make that distinction meaningless http://m.

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17013 on: June 14, 2016, 11:58:52 PM »
The only guns that should be legal are shotguns and handguns, for hunting and self-defense purposes respectively. Semi-auto? Get the fuck out.

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17014 on: June 15, 2016, 12:02:41 AM »
I want to argue with you about that but first let me change my profile pic to a lifted 4x4

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17015 on: June 15, 2016, 12:43:49 AM »


:mindblown

edit: I should clarify yea a lot of stealing was going on but that's not something you say as a presidential candidate

Man, is Three Kings on Netflix? I'd rewatch that.
©@©™

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17016 on: June 15, 2016, 02:41:46 AM »
The only guns that should be legal are shotguns and handguns, for hunting and self-defense purposes respectively. Semi-auto? Get the fuck out.
Don't discount how deadly handguns can be in mass shootings, they're easier to reload. I actually think most of the victims at Sandy Hook were shot with a pistol rather than the AR15.

Plus I'm sure you know that handguns are the main weapon for homicide and all that so they really are the biggest problem and have to be dealt with somehow. Even as little as a universal background check system would be a step forward.

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17017 on: June 15, 2016, 02:51:40 AM »
One step at a time. The original draft of that post just said shotguns.

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17018 on: June 15, 2016, 03:12:32 AM »
Sorry, I definitely didn't want to imply that you would want to take the easiest solution. There's just a lot to get confused by when it comes to how guns can be used and state-by-state laws which puts it on the level of the Israel-Palestine debate as far as being a clusterfuck where everyone has an intuitive solution but then the problem goes on for years and years which honestly makes me depressed to do more than explain whatever background facts that I can.

And I hardly am an expert on either issue or see a real path forward.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17019 on: June 15, 2016, 04:13:51 AM »
Man, is Three Kings on Netflix? I'd rewatch that.
Doesn't appear to be available for "free" streaming anywhere, $3 on Amazon/iTunes/YouTube/etc.

I'm am tweeting Trump about this horse shit, he can get it done unlike Corrupt Hillary and Crazy Bernie, Make America Great Again with free Three Kings streaming for all citizens.

Boogie

  • The Smooth Canadian
  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17020 on: June 15, 2016, 06:37:54 AM »
The only guns that should be legal are shotguns and handguns, for hunting and self-defense purposes respectively. Semi-auto? Get the fuck out.

Handguns and shotguns can be semi-auto too.  :P
MMA

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17021 on: June 15, 2016, 07:29:16 AM »
yeah, semi-automatic just means it fires every time you pull the trigger

you don't have to manually load the next shot like with say a bolt-action or some kind of old timey revolver where you have to spin the action

automatic firearms are already heavily restricted in the united states and have been since the 1930s, you have to go through the ATF and such...thanks prohibition

(disclaimer: 96% of my gun knowledge and usage comes from world war i and ii era firearms)

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17022 on: June 15, 2016, 07:40:21 AM »
The only guns that should be legal are shotguns and handguns, for hunting and self-defense purposes respectively. Semi-auto? Get the fuck out.

You really don't need a gun to defend yourself Andy.

You only feel this way cause people around you might have guns.

I've never felt like I needed a gun.

Boogie

  • The Smooth Canadian
  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17023 on: June 15, 2016, 09:38:39 AM »
The only guns that should be legal are shotguns and handguns, for hunting and self-defense purposes respectively. Semi-auto? Get the fuck out.

You really don't need a gun to defend yourself Andy.

You only feel this way cause people around you might have guns.

I've never felt like I needed a gun.

I more or less agree.   It's the fetish-ization of self defense in America that is a major part of the problem.

I kind of feel that "self defense" is a less valid reason for allowing gun ownership than someone who wants one for recreational target shooting.  But that's just me.

Like I've said before, I carry a gun 40 hours a week, and do think guns can be "cool" from a hobbyist perspective, but I feel absolutely no need or desire to carry a gun 41 hours a week.
MMA

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17024 on: June 15, 2016, 10:07:32 AM »
The only guns that should be legal are shotguns and handguns, for hunting and self-defense purposes respectively. Semi-auto? Get the fuck out.

You really don't need a gun to defend yourself Andy.

You only feel this way cause people around you might have guns.

I've never felt like I needed a gun.

I more or less agree.   It's the fetish-ization of self defense in America that is a major part of the problem.

I kind of feel that "self defense" is a less valid reason for allowing gun ownership than someone who wants one for recreational target shooting.  But that's just me.

Like I've said before, I carry a gun 40 hours a week, and do think guns can be "cool" from a hobbyist perspective, but I feel absolutely no need or desire to carry a gun 41 hours a week.
I agree with this. The defense angle always reeks of "I wish I could have a Rambo moment and shoot someone"

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17025 on: June 15, 2016, 10:13:56 AM »
Makes sense to me. Hunting rifle is also something you can really check up on if the person hunts.

Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17026 on: June 15, 2016, 10:20:56 AM »
The only guns that should be legal are shotguns and handguns, for hunting and self-defense purposes respectively. Semi-auto? Get the fuck out.

You really don't need a gun to defend yourself Andy.

You only feel this way cause people around you might have guns.

I've never felt like I needed a gun.

I more or less agree.   It's the fetish-ization of self defense in America that is a major part of the problem.

I kind of feel that "self defense" is a less valid reason for allowing gun ownership than someone who wants one for recreational target shooting.  But that's just me.

Like I've said before, I carry a gun 40 hours a week, and do think guns can be "cool" from a hobbyist perspective, but I feel absolutely no need or desire to carry a gun 41 hours a week.

like i'm supposed to believe a cop from toronto doesn't work any paid overtime.

 :comeon

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17027 on: June 15, 2016, 12:00:33 PM »
https://twitter.com/MazMHussain/status/742851199838355456

Justify your actions like honest to god movie villains, CIA brehs. :heh

This is the case he's talking about:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_El-Masri#Abduction_and_CIA_torture_in_Macedonia

Boogie

  • The Smooth Canadian
  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17028 on: June 15, 2016, 12:00:43 PM »
I was being rhetorical.  :-*
MMA

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17029 on: June 15, 2016, 12:31:14 PM »
Only allow blunderbusses and you have to dress like a Pilgrim even if you're concealed carrying the pistol size type.

mormapope

  • WHADDYA HEAR, WHADDYA SAY
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17030 on: June 15, 2016, 02:09:49 PM »
The only guns that should be legal are shotguns and handguns, for hunting and self-defense purposes respectively. Semi-auto? Get the fuck out.

Handguns and shotguns can be semi-auto too.  :P

Shotguns can also be magazine fed.

I also agree with the self defense reasoning stated by people being some sort of Rambo fantasy. Guns are really fun to shoot and its a neat hobby to have, but you're sort of a pussy if you feel you need to be armed at all times.
OH!

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17031 on: June 15, 2016, 02:50:16 PM »
I wonder if gun nuts who imagine all sorts of rad self-defense scenarios do as much prevention in other (more realistic) areas. My gut says no, but who knows.

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17032 on: June 15, 2016, 02:52:51 PM »
I guarantee no one would dress like a Pilgrim in order to be prepared for a shootout that will never happen, it's why I added it to my gun control proposal.

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17033 on: June 15, 2016, 02:53:08 PM »
I'd like to build a bunker and stock up and food and toilet paper.  My wife isn't convinced though... yet.

Olivia Wilde Homo

  • Proud Kinkshamer
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17034 on: June 15, 2016, 03:02:23 PM »
Russia says they might release the hacked emails once the Kremlin gives it the go ahead.

Also Russia apparently hacked the DNC and stole documents about Donald Trump.

The fuckery this election is so intense that there's no turning back now.  Too many bells that can't be unrung after November, regardless of who wins.
🍆🍆

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
©ZH

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17036 on: June 15, 2016, 03:52:14 PM »
http://m.


Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Hi

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17038 on: June 15, 2016, 04:10:10 PM »
I'd like to build a bunker and stock up and food and toilet paper.  My wife isn't convinced though... yet.

Give your bunker mate a choice in the matter  :doge

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17039 on: June 15, 2016, 04:10:38 PM »
I'd like to build a bunker and stock up and food and toilet paper.  My wife isn't convinced though... yet.

I'm sure those open carry yahoos are paid up on their long-term care premiums, their supplemental catastrophic insurance premiums, fully funded on their retirement for the year, and all the other risk mitigation tools available to individuals.