Author Topic: US Politics Thread |OT| THE DARKEST TIMELINE  (Read 2656107 times)

0 Members and 23 Guests are viewing this topic.


Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17281 on: June 30, 2016, 12:47:03 AM »
That's big, cause the meteor only needs 5% to get public funding for 2020.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17282 on: June 30, 2016, 12:59:38 AM »
Only 2 points to get in the debates.

Though the duopoly would probably change the rules just to keep the meteor out.

I'm a Puppy!

  • Knows the muffin man.
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17283 on: June 30, 2016, 01:22:40 AM »
Giant Meteor 2016!!
que

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17284 on: June 30, 2016, 01:41:19 AM »

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17285 on: June 30, 2016, 01:45:22 AM »
probably because they actually had to bootstrap instead of looting the Third World (and its predecessors) to get ahead. (The Republic of China and the composite materials industry comes to mind here.)

Isn't China moving in pretty hard into Africa and / or maritime domain in Asia ?
ὕβρις

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17286 on: June 30, 2016, 02:21:11 AM »
Once robots can replicate the fine motor skills involved in manufacturing, won't the factories just move to whatever country is the shortest distance between the raw resources and consumers? Effectively, there's no money being kept in the country by making it yourself but putting up barriers to trade now can really kick you in the ass in 10 (or 30?) years.

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17287 on: June 30, 2016, 02:32:32 AM »
(Image removed from quote.)
People that already don't watch CNN because they hate distinguished black fellows to continue not watching CNN. dotjpg.
Hi

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17288 on: June 30, 2016, 11:45:31 AM »
Although their tears are really great, it's kind of annoying that there are so many people who think this email nonsense is something that the Attorney General and Clinton need to tiptoe around, like there's anything above a 0% chance that the emails will affect Clinton's candidacy. Loretta should just come out and endorse Hillary straight up.

Having a private meeting with the spouse of a person under investigation by the FBI!!! This is an outrage. She might have violated the law.
©@©™

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17289 on: June 30, 2016, 12:25:46 PM »
Although their tears are really great, it's kind of annoying that there are so many people who think this email nonsense is something that the Attorney General and Clinton need to tiptoe around, like there's anything above a 0% chance that the emails will affect Clinton's candidacy. Loretta should just come out and endorse Hillary straight up.

Having a private meeting with the spouse of a person under investigation by the FBI!!! This is an outrage. She might have violated the law.

Yeah no. Point to the statute.

*points to reddit*
©@©™

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17290 on: June 30, 2016, 12:44:55 PM »
Although their tears are really great, it's kind of annoying that there are so many people who think this email nonsense is something that the Attorney General and Clinton need to tiptoe around, like there's anything above a 0% chance that the emails will affect Clinton's candidacy. Loretta should just come out and endorse Hillary straight up.

Having a private meeting with the spouse of a person under investigation by the FBI!!! This is an outrage. She might have violated the law.

Yeah no. Point to the statute.

Obama obviously unilaterally changed the law in order for this meeting to take place, and therefore Loretta Lynch must also be impeached!
dog

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17291 on: June 30, 2016, 01:50:44 PM »
Although their tears are really great, it's kind of annoying that there are so many people who think this email nonsense is something that the Attorney General and Clinton need to tiptoe around, like there's anything above a 0% chance that the emails will affect Clinton's candidacy. Loretta should just come out and endorse Hillary straight up.

Having a private meeting with the spouse of a person under investigation by the FBI!!! This is an outrage. She might have violated the law.

Yeah no. Point to the statute.
You cannot convict a husband and wife for the same crime. What if Bill was negotiating his own conviction?!?

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17292 on: June 30, 2016, 01:58:15 PM »
You cannot convict a husband and wife for the same crime. What if Bill was negotiating his own conviction?!?


CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17293 on: June 30, 2016, 03:25:17 PM »
Kinda secretly hoping she is indicted, just to see what kind of melt down you and Tasty would have  :-[

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17294 on: June 30, 2016, 03:39:42 PM »
Kinda secretly hoping she is indicted, just to see what kind of melt down you and Tasty would have  :-[

Wouldn't just be me, a Hillary indictment would not only be a waste of time and a Benghazi panel-esque farce, it'd lead to a Trump presidency and a loss of at least two SCOTUS seats.

A lot of people would be melting down, and rightly so.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17295 on: June 30, 2016, 03:48:14 PM »
Kinda secretly hoping she is indicted, just to see what kind of melt down you and Tasty would have  :-[

You and Samson might take it even worse when they gave the nomination to Biden.

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17296 on: June 30, 2016, 03:48:30 PM »
See? Look, you're already mad at the hypothetical  :lol


Mandark, I don't think anyone could take anything worse than how Walrus would handle a full blown indictment :rofl

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17297 on: June 30, 2016, 03:52:23 PM »
Dude, I voted for Bernie.  Just never drank the kool-aid.

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17298 on: June 30, 2016, 03:54:10 PM »
I uh, don't see how that changes what I've said?

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17299 on: June 30, 2016, 03:56:11 PM »
If you were talking to someone else with the "u mad" stuff...

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17300 on: June 30, 2016, 03:56:52 PM »
Yup. I started addressing you after I typed your name.

Edit for clarity: I was typing the first part of that to Tasty there, your reply came quicker than mine, so I edited in the part where I answered your post. Now all fun has been sucked from this.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2016, 04:01:32 PM by CatsCatsCats »

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17301 on: June 30, 2016, 04:01:01 PM »
Oh, first part was for Andy.  Fair enough.

Definitely they'd melt down.  Andy follows politics by investing himself in a brand, and Walrus has rage issues that he's learned to lampshade.  This thread would be a swamp of shitposting for weeks.  You know, moreso than usual.

Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17302 on: June 30, 2016, 04:03:46 PM »
::eats ice cream and avoids being baited

spoiler (click to show/hide)
[close]

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17303 on: June 30, 2016, 04:10:28 PM »
On a lighter note, the presumptive Republican nominee for Representative in MN-2 has said some bonkers shit about slavery.

Quote
In fact, if you really want to be quite frank about it, how does somebody else owning a slave affect me? It doesn’t. If I don’t think it is right, I won’t own one, and people always say ‘well if you don’t want to marry somebody of the same sex, you don’t have to, but why tell somebody else they can’t.  Uh, you know if you don’t want to own a slave, don’t. But don’t tell other people they can’t.

Let's put aside that he seems to think slavery was ended by a Supreme Court ruling and that the 13th Amendment doesn't exist.  Who wants to point out the hole in this logic?

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17304 on: June 30, 2016, 05:30:10 PM »
ya'll just can't handle his hot takes
Quote
In 2012, Lewis called women “simply ignorant of the important issues in life,” and he said most young women are “non-thinking,” during his radio show.

Lewis defended his comments, saying “[l]iberal reporters and typical politicians may not like the bluntness of the way I’ve framed some issues in my career.”

Steve Contra

  • Bought a lemon tree straight cash
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17305 on: June 30, 2016, 06:09:16 PM »
::eats ice cream and avoids being baited

spoiler (click to show/hide)
[close]
I'm pretty sure TVC was telling me about this exact fantasy last week.
vin

Broseidon

  • Estado Homo
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17306 on: June 30, 2016, 09:55:49 PM »
 :kobeyuck
bent


Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17308 on: July 01, 2016, 12:07:59 AM »
When people realize that they're truly powerless, and that the people they hate most have all the power, and that there is absolutely nothing, not a goddamn thing in the world they can do about it, I believe they feel a special kind of legit shook.

Tell us more about game seven.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17309 on: July 01, 2016, 09:38:25 AM »
The Jezebel article on that is probably worth reading.  There are reasons most outlets haven't run with the story yet.

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17310 on: July 01, 2016, 10:28:04 AM »
The Jezebel article on that is probably worth reading.  There are reasons most outlets haven't run with the story yet.

The Illuminati?
010

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17311 on: July 01, 2016, 11:25:57 AM »
The Jezebel article on that is probably worth reading.  There are reasons most outlets haven't run with the story yet.

The Illuminati?

There's a pretty good chance that it's bullshit, but also yeah.
©@©™

I'm a Puppy!

  • Knows the muffin man.
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17312 on: July 01, 2016, 11:56:14 AM »
I don't get why. I mean it's not like Jezebel has a reputation for posting stories that might not meet journalistic standards of major media houses.
que

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17313 on: July 01, 2016, 02:11:51 PM »
After Hogan, I don't think they (gawker) are going to break a story like this unless there's video evidence with the young girls holding up multiple forms of ID.

recursivelyenumerable

  • you might think that; I couldn't possibly comment
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17314 on: July 01, 2016, 02:55:48 PM »
Omg please let it be Gingrich
QED

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17315 on: July 01, 2016, 04:51:13 PM »
Bernie supporters are the biggest scumbags in politics, IMO.

What form of incurable cancer would you find to be suitable for them?
©@©™

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17316 on: July 01, 2016, 05:24:06 PM »
Btw, sorry for the psychopath shtick, guys. I'm gonna stop with that.

How short, thy memory.

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17317 on: July 01, 2016, 06:31:43 PM »
The Jezebel article on that is probably worth reading.  There are reasons most outlets haven't run with the story yet.

Not that it says anything on what could have had happen or that specific case, but the idea that members of the elite are all secretly  promiscuous and partaking in depraved orgies with nubile or underage women is a pretty common popular fantasy.
ὕβρις

curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17318 on: July 01, 2016, 06:37:09 PM »
Edit: why the hell are people liking that post? I kept my promise. There's no shtick.

:gurl

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17319 on: July 01, 2016, 06:41:51 PM »
The Jezebel article on that is probably worth reading.  There are reasons most outlets haven't run with the story yet.

Not that it says anything on what could have had happen or that specific case, but the idea that members of the elite are all secretly  promiscuous and partaking in depraved orgies with nubile or underage women is a pretty common popular fantasy.

If I was a member of the elite, I'd be doing so much way worse than banging 14 year olds.
serge

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17320 on: July 01, 2016, 07:24:01 PM »
The Jezebel article on that is probably worth reading.  There are reasons most outlets haven't run with the story yet.

Not that it says anything on what could have had happen or that specific case, but the idea that members of the elite are all secretly  promiscuous and partaking in depraved orgies with nubile or underage women is a pretty common popular fantasy.

If I was a member of the elite, I'd be doing so much way worse than banging 14 year olds.

Bang one 84 y/o, it's like 6 14 y/o's at once.
©@©™

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17321 on: July 01, 2016, 08:03:17 PM »
HA Goodman is shaping up to become the left wing version of the newspaper chief editor in Watchmen.

Quote
Hillary, a little advice. Don't treat the FBI the way you treat Hillary Bots. Just one lie, HRC, and JAIL TIME, so stay honest if possible

Quote
HRC TO BE "INTERVIEWED" BY FBI ON SATURDAY. AG Lynch promises to abide by FBI indictments. GAME OVER Hillary Bots. BERNIE SANDERS WINS SOON!

Quote
Gee, this security review is so weird! AG Lynch promises to abide by any recommendation from the FBI! CRIMINAL INDICTMENTS COMING FOR HRC!!!

Quote
Hillary's house of cards is almost about to fall. AG Lynch and Bill meet to TALK GOLF. Huma ALWAYS TRIED to do right. Get out the popcorn!

https://twitter.com/hagoodmanauthor

I'm afraid he won't give us the satisfaction of a meltdown : at this pace, he will continue to push that "indictement is just around the corner" several years into the potential Clinton presidency, like Birthers did.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2016, 08:08:55 PM by VomKriege »
ὕβρις

Human Snorenado

  • Stay out of Malibu, Lebowski
  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17322 on: July 02, 2016, 03:26:23 AM »
HRC could win with an indictment easily. It would just take more work from Obama. That said, 0% chance it happens

This shit is why I said that Bernie fans are scum, btw. Rooting for someone from your own goddamn party to be arrested so that your guy who lost a democratic election can benefit. Shit is vile.

There's your problem. Those people aren't part of the democratic party.
yar

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17323 on: July 02, 2016, 04:45:24 AM »
Why would anyone want to be right about now. :yuck
Hi

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17324 on: July 02, 2016, 03:24:33 PM »
Quote
"Secretary Clinton gave a voluntary interview this morning about her email arrangements while she was Secretary," Nick Merrill, a campaign spokesman, said in the statement. "She is pleased to have had the opportunity to assist the Department of Justice in bringing this review to a conclusion. Out of respect for the investigative process, she will not comment further on her interview."

Pack it up, boys, no indictment confirmed.
dog

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17325 on: July 02, 2016, 06:27:32 PM »
Quote
"Secretary Clinton gave a voluntary interview this morning about her email arrangements while she was Secretary," Nick Merrill, a campaign spokesman, said in the statement. "She is pleased to have had the opportunity to assist the Department of Justice in bringing this review to a conclusion. Out of respect for the investigative process, she will not comment further on her interview."

Pack it up, boys, no indictment confirmed.

More like she's already pleading the Fif because she knows it's over. President Bernie Sanders confirmed, Andrex suiciding, NAAAAAHHH QUEEN! :lawd
©@©™

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17326 on: July 02, 2016, 07:57:29 PM »
:lol

Joe how do you consistently manage to be the best poster here.

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17327 on: July 02, 2016, 09:06:24 PM »
CNN reporting their sources are saying no charges.

Well no shit.

Get fucked, Bernie.

Bernie stans:


brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17328 on: July 02, 2016, 11:31:58 PM »
These two pretending like they haven't been clenched for months.

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17329 on: July 03, 2016, 12:32:30 AM »
These two pretending like they haven't been clenched for months.

:lol :umad

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17330 on: July 03, 2016, 02:13:45 AM »
If "sources close to" DOJ or FBI knew everything, America wouldn't need the DOJ or FBI. Years of group think about to end. Bernie will win ! Hillary Bots reduced to citing sources close to friends who know the DOJ and FBI. They're scared. They know Hillary Clinton will be indicted.
ὕβρις

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17331 on: July 03, 2016, 03:13:41 PM »
Your investment is also quite strange.

Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17332 on: July 03, 2016, 03:52:08 PM »
When you post about knocking the heads off of people it makes me uncomfortable, Walrus.

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17333 on: July 03, 2016, 04:06:33 PM »
Really the world would be a better place if more people wanted to knockoff the heads of the gop.
Hi

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17334 on: July 03, 2016, 04:21:38 PM »
How is it strange? I don't want Republicans to succeed in a 4 year smear cycle. Since 2012 they've been attacking Hillary nonstop in preparation for this election. First Benghazi, then the emails. It'll be the biggest long con ever played on the American people if they're successful. Bernie fans who have co-opted their disgusting smear campaign are almost as bad, and nothing will be more satisfying than seeing their hopes and delusions come crashing down on their heads.

My investment in this is quite reasonable.
All that's fine but you post nearly psychotic rants and get way too worked up.

To be clear, wishing death and cancer on people is just off putting even when I agree with you. And i think that's because your posts come off completely serious

mormapope

  • WHADDYA HEAR, WHADDYA SAY
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17335 on: July 03, 2016, 04:43:09 PM »
How is it strange? I don't want Republicans to succeed in a 4 year smear cycle. Since 2012 they've been attacking Hillary nonstop in preparation for this election. First Benghazi, then the emails. It'll be the biggest long con ever played on the American people if they're successful. Bernie fans who have co-opted their disgusting smear campaign are almost as bad, and nothing will be more satisfying than seeing their hopes and delusions come crashing down on their heads.

My investment in this is quite reasonable.

You realize both republicans and democrats are gonna hound Clinton on every decision she makes for the next four years, right?

Enjoy these calm months before her presidency
 :letsfukk
OH!

daycru

  • Junior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17336 on: July 03, 2016, 08:22:45 PM »
Walrus showing signs of following in the footsteps of another Hillary fan, Orlando Omar.

daycru

  • Junior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17337 on: July 04, 2016, 03:28:55 AM »
Can we not have these useless meta-discussions please?

Anyway, Trump campaign is a fucking garbage fire.
I'll have whatever discussion you deem appropriate as long as it keeps you from shooting up a middle school.

curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17338 on: July 04, 2016, 04:52:51 AM »
This sort of problematic behavior from Hillary supporters is really making it difficult for me to support her candidacy.

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: US Politics Thread of Drumpf v. Killary |OT| We didn't listen.
« Reply #17339 on: July 04, 2016, 09:16:21 AM »
This sort of problematic behavior from Hillary supporters is really making it difficult for me to support her candidacy.
It's toxic and gross