Assimilate clearly thinks Peterson triggers the libs around here and that is basically 95% of Assimilate's enjoyment out of this site(and seemingly his go to way to try and convince himself he is better than other people), but clearly based on his lack of intellectual curiosity in general, the guy doesn't have it in him to radicalize himself to Peterson like the etiolate's that truly find self-worth in finding those perceived intellectual arguments that reinforce their biases.
What biases? I still don't see anything controversial about Peterson. At least not so far as something you can't actually witness for yourself. For example, college campuses are fucking brutal these days. Kicking comedians out, rallying to prevent people from speaking (not protest, legitimately shutting people out with blow horns), safe spaces, etc. That's something he talks about, and there's evidence for it.
What else? The stripping of masculinity? Well, yeah, aren't we seeing the phrase "toxic masculinity" used continuously now? I mean, we can argue that this is only in assbackwards places like Ree but Ree gets it from pop culture, hollywood, mainstream media. It's there.
Compelled speech? The thing that most of you hate him for. Again, not very controversial to me and i've always been in full agreement. I don't think we need to be calling people cis, and zir.
Apparently, these things make you an incel now or something.
