Author Topic: Other Forums Containment Thread  (Read 2555455 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Don Rumata

  • Hard To Be A John
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1260 on: September 26, 2021, 06:08:33 PM »
:whatisthis


Imagine spending a considerable amount of time on typing up a full transcript of some youtube bullshit
Court document from the tribunal of public opinion.

EDIT: Top of the page  :nsfw
https://webm.red/view/7lyI.webm
 ;)

BIONIC

  • Virgo. Live Music. The Office. Tacos. Fur mom. True crime junkie. INTJ.
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1261 on: September 26, 2021, 06:11:50 PM »
Imagine writing all that instead of spending time with your wife. He apparently has a kid these days too  :titus
Margs

Taco Bell Tower

  • Your likes are brought to you by YUM! Brands
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1262 on: September 26, 2021, 06:12:00 PM »
*head hurts*

james

  • Donate to the JAMES FUND
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1263 on: September 26, 2021, 06:12:20 PM »
https://twitter.com/marenaltman/status/1442087416869830658

:trumps

The imbeciles who invented astrology really should have snuck in a few more "when Jupiter shines, its time to go down on your man" type of things
:O

Taco Bell Tower

  • Your likes are brought to you by YUM! Brands
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1264 on: September 26, 2021, 06:15:21 PM »
Imagine writing all that instead of spending time with your wife. He apparently has a kid these days too  :titus

 :whatisthis

Don Rumata

  • Hard To Be A John
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1265 on: September 26, 2021, 06:18:00 PM »
Imagine writing all that instead of spending time with your wife. He apparently has a kid these days too  :titus
Who do you think typed all that shit?  :rash

BIONIC

  • Virgo. Live Music. The Office. Tacos. Fur mom. True crime junkie. INTJ.
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1266 on: September 26, 2021, 06:26:02 PM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/warning-hyrule-warriors-aoc-runs-like-shit.442834/page-9#post-74113371

Quote from: Weltall Zero, post: 74069749, member: 8546
All I want from you is an acknowledgement of your blatant gaslighting.

Quote from: Snormy MODERATOR, post: 74113371, member: 2756
Lets try and stop throwing gaslighting around like that. It has a history and meaning of oppressing, psychologically abusing women. Have some consideration for the women on site reading the word with such a meaning, seeing it being used by men in an argument over... frame rate drops?

You put enough effort and thoughts into your posts. You don't need to rely on this language. Thanks.

:social2
Margs

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1267 on: September 26, 2021, 06:29:31 PM »
Quote
It does run like shit, but the game is actually great once you get used to how badly it runs

:titus

Quote
Quote
"The game runs fine" takes are completely embarrassing.
It's not a take, it's a personal (subjective) playing experience. Nobody is arguing about math.

:titus



:titus
« Last Edit: September 26, 2021, 06:34:19 PM by Nintex »
🤴

Taco Bell Tower

  • Your likes are brought to you by YUM! Brands
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1268 on: September 26, 2021, 06:36:55 PM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/warning-hyrule-warriors-aoc-runs-like-shit.442834/page-9#post-74113371

Quote from: Weltall Zero, post: 74069749, member: 8546
All I want from you is an acknowledgement of your blatant gaslighting.

Quote from: Snormy MODERATOR, post: 74113371, member: 2756
Lets try and stop throwing gaslighting around like that. It has a history and meaning of oppressing, psychologically abusing women. Have some consideration for the women on site reading the word with such a meaning, seeing it being used by men in an argument over... frame rate drops?

You put enough effort and thoughts into your posts. You don't need to rely on this language. Thanks.

:social2

Quote
Have some consideration for the women on site reading the word with such a meaning, seeing it being used by men in an argument over... frame rate drops?

:what

Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1269 on: September 26, 2021, 06:41:20 PM »
That gaslighting comment is actual insanity.  I would bet the VAST majority of the women on the site are ignorant to the history behind it and just take it to mean what it means in general vernacular (which at this point is really just "lying").  You know, like most words that slowly change throughout history because language evolves.

Also, what happened with that dude revealing Snormy to be a shared mod account? Anything come of that?

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1270 on: September 26, 2021, 06:43:20 PM »

Also, what happened with that dude revealing Snormy to be a shared mod account? Anything come of that?
They were gaslit :trumps
🤴

Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1271 on: September 26, 2021, 06:50:58 PM »
Sorry, wasn't gaslighting essentially an obscure term almost nobody used for most of its life, until it exploded in popularity and became an actually commonly-used phrase once people broadened application beyond "manipulating to an institutionalization-worthy level of mental instability"? Was there ever a period where women at large felt a deep and emotional connection to the phrase or is this just more bullshit using women to justify stupid policy.

This post makes me actually angry:
Quote from: jph139
The issue is that astrology today (alongside other "spiritual-but-not-religious" beliefs) is most visibly practiced by marginalized groups (read: women and members of the LGBT community), and while each individual "this is dumb" post isn't going to do any harm, collecting a bunch of people together to shit on it may end up breeding a toxic and/or exclusionary environment.

It's why a "wow, this mainstream religious belief is so dumb, they must be idiots to believe that" is fine, but "wow, the belief system of this indigenous group is dumb, they must be idiots to believe that" is probably over a line. Why you're good to shit on Evangelicals, but shitting on Vodou might be in bad taste. Certain groups require additional privileges and protections; justice and fairness are not equivalent.

Now, I think a reasonable person could make the argument that many "astrology people" are in a place of privilege, or that just because a belief system is mainstream (like Christianity) doesn't mean that vulnerable people won't be hurt by attacks on it. But that's going to be a pretty complex discussion and I can see why no one would want to deal with it if you don't need to.

I've seen variations of this before, and it's bullshit: That grifters find their most visible success in specific minority or marginalized groups does not mean you get to equate those grifts with the general beliefs of those groups. The 'most visible' practicers of astrology are women and LGBT people, that does not mean most women and LGBT respect astrology or would feel excluded by people pointing at it and going 'lol'. Equating it with indigenous belief systems ought to, by era standards, cop an inflammatory comparison ban. You do not reward snake oil salesman for successfully targeting marginalized groups by giving their snake oil special protections, and you do not conflate that snake oil with an actual belief system deeply integrated with the history of a people.

I was a freshman at an all-girls boarding school eight hundred and sixty two years ago when The Craft came out; I had a roommate I quite liked form a coven and, at one point, inform me she'd cast a binding spell to bind me to the dorm room door. I do not, to this day, know what the fuck that was supposed to do. But it was silly, and I and many many others had a pretty good laugh about it at the time. Because, despite The Craft convincing a bunch of tween/teen girls to try out being a witch, believing that shit never became a default part of being a teen girl. Stop trying to hide your dumb beliefs behind the rest of us, we think that shit's dumb too.

Don Rumata

  • Hard To Be A John
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1272 on: September 26, 2021, 06:51:31 PM »
That gaslighting comment is actual insanity.  I would bet the VAST majority of the women on the site are ignorant to the history behind it and just take it to mean what it means in general vernacular (which at this point is really just "lying").  You know, like most words that slowly change throughout history because language evolves.

Also, what happened with that dude revealing Snormy to be a shared mod account? Anything come of that?
I don't like your implication of a femme-presenting account, being passed around like a used joint.  :wag

BIONIC

  • Virgo. Live Music. The Office. Tacos. Fur mom. True crime junkie. INTJ.
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1273 on: September 26, 2021, 07:27:20 PM »
I was a freshman at an all-girls boarding school

Wait, we have a woman posting on the Bire?   :whoo

filler, James, Nintex we finally did it, pals :rejoice
Margs

james

  • Donate to the JAMES FUND
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1274 on: September 26, 2021, 07:36:34 PM »
I was a freshman at an all-girls boarding school

Wait, we have a woman posting on the Bire?   :whoo

filler, James, Nintex we finally did it, pals :rejoice

They were one. It's the bore, they're a man now
:O

BIONIC

  • Virgo. Live Music. The Office. Tacos. Fur mom. True crime junkie. INTJ.
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1275 on: September 26, 2021, 07:51:59 PM »
:stahp
Margs

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1276 on: September 26, 2021, 08:03:46 PM »
Quote
Shelby: "I think it's just the historical context. Well I'm definitely not going into ResetEra and trying to defend us. I definitely won't engage there. It's just going to make me feel very bad."

Matt: "Dude, ResetEra is the last place you want to go to get any sort of meter on your tone or how you're coming across cause they jumped that we were secret alt-right dogwhistlers because we mentioned PewDiePie one time and all kinds of nonsense."

Shelby: "The thing that sucks is they won't forget it in a day. For months. A year. We were recovering from people on ResetEra calling us alt-right dogwhistlers because they hadn't even watched the video but had seen others talking about it in the comments. It snowballed."

Matt: "It was just like the Last Of Us situation. They think we said anyone who didn't like TLOU is a bigot! We never said that shit! But they believed it because after months of that being in the conversation, same thing at ResetEra they were convinced- We are not alt-right, dude! They had all these really loose, such crazy evidence to support that and that was the conversation about us for a year. They were LOOKING through our videos and trying to find proof. Dude we're not alt-right dogwhistling. What are you talking about. And that's how I feel about this situation. We are not racist. First you said we were alt-right and now we're racist apparently. Is it Reset Era or ResetEra? Am I being racist by calling it ResetEra?!"

 :kermit
ど助平

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1277 on: September 26, 2021, 09:03:48 PM »
 :maduro
*****

Uncle

  • Have You Ever
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1278 on: September 26, 2021, 09:10:40 PM »
That gaslighting comment is actual insanity.  I would bet the VAST majority of the women on the site are ignorant to the history behind it and just take it to mean what it means in general vernacular (which at this point is really just "lying").  You know, like most words that slowly change throughout history because language evolves.

"white men can't just throw around the word gaslight when it has such a deep meaning to so many women who have had their gasses lit by men"

"white women shouldn't just throw around the word triggered when it has all-too-real connotations of horrific physiological reactions among men who have lived through the horrors of war"

"how can mods easily throw out the word trauma to describe reading text on a screen, when trauma is most commonly used for events that scar a person for life, like watching your child die"

:idont :idont :idont
Uncle

Crumb

  • *cough*
  • Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1279 on: September 26, 2021, 09:25:23 PM »
The Nintendie spin-off forum name:

http://www.famiboards.com/
Is that a Boards of Canada type font?

Kurt Russell

  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1280 on: September 26, 2021, 09:26:27 PM »
That gaslighting comment is actual insanity.  I would bet the VAST majority of the women on the site are ignorant to the history behind it and just take it to mean what it means in general vernacular (which at this point is really just "lying").  You know, like most words that slowly change throughout history because language evolves.

Also, what happened with that dude revealing Snormy to be a shared mod account? Anything come of that?

Maybe I misunderstand the term myself, but isn't 'gaslighting' essentially a infantile way to say emotional manipulation? in the same way that toxic has come to mean 'opinions that I don't like'?

(Nintex tucker meme this one pls)
woke

Uncle

  • Have You Ever
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1281 on: September 26, 2021, 09:36:08 PM »
I can't believe kurt russell would come in here and sealion everyone like this
Uncle

HaughtyFrank

  • Haughty and a little naughty
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1282 on: September 26, 2021, 09:36:37 PM »
Quote
Quote
I know the type, people thats struggle pronouncing my latino last name and end up saying shit like "Diaz" or " Gonzalez" as a replacement but say "Galifianakis" or "Cumberbatch" without missing a beat.

Fuck this channel and those that try to downplay it. "TheY R just leArniNg". Fuck off
.

They've actually made fun of Cumberbatch's name in multiple videos.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/is-deathloop-really-a-masterpiece-girlfriend-reviews.491625/post-74160546


Out of all the names, why would you pick Cumberbatch to make your point   :lol

Lonewulfeus

  • Former Unofficial Ambassador to ResetEra
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1283 on: September 26, 2021, 09:51:08 PM »
I can't believe kurt russell would come in here and sealion everyone like this

I wish Kurt Russell would come in here seagulling  :mouf

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1284 on: September 26, 2021, 10:03:59 PM »
I hope they ban Girlfriend Reviews threads for making fun of a guy's name.

It really distracts from the ActiBlizz (criminal sexual abuse), Arkane (credible accusations of criminal sexual abuse) and Nintendo (credible accusations of criminal sexual abuse, rampant anti-Black racism in Smash, anti-sex work bigotry) hype threads.

Propagandhim

  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1285 on: September 26, 2021, 10:16:16 PM »
Every single video game studio engages in criminal sex abuse, but not everyone makes fun of peoples' names (unless they're white).   :wag

Potato

  • Senior's Member
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1286 on: September 26, 2021, 11:42:03 PM »
That gaslighting comment is actual insanity.  I would bet the VAST majority of the women on the site are ignorant to the history behind it and just take it to mean what it means in general vernacular (which at this point is really just "lying").  You know, like most words that slowly change throughout history because language evolves.

"white men can't just throw around the word gaslight when it has such a deep meaning to so many women who have had their gasses lit by men"
What if that's my fetish?
Spud

Potato

  • Senior's Member
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1287 on: September 26, 2021, 11:45:15 PM »
Quote
Quote
I know the type, people thats struggle pronouncing my latino last name and end up saying shit like "Diaz" or " Gonzalez" as a replacement but say "Galifianakis" or "Cumberbatch" without missing a beat.

Fuck this channel and those that try to downplay it. "TheY R just leArniNg". Fuck off
.

They've actually made fun of Cumberbatch's name in multiple videos.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/is-deathloop-really-a-masterpiece-girlfriend-reviews.491625/post-74160546


Out of all the names, why would you pick Cumberbatch to make your point   :lol
What fucking white person is able to say Galifianakis or any other multisyllable Greek name correctly?
GTFO you dickheads.
Spud

Lonewulfeus

  • Former Unofficial Ambassador to ResetEra
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1288 on: September 27, 2021, 12:00:27 AM »
Do Irish names, signed the YTs

Transhuman

  • youtu.be/KCVCmGPgJS0
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1289 on: September 27, 2021, 12:11:07 AM »
There was a kid in my primary school called Michael McTaggart, and let me tell you something, you did not want to grow up in the 90's with a last name that rhymes with McFaggot, trust me.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1290 on: September 27, 2021, 12:21:57 AM »
User banned (2 weeks): Drive-by post in a sensitive thread

The press really wanted to like this game
an on-topic post similar to a bunch of others suddenly becomes bannable if the thread becomes too butthurt about another topic? :huh

ShutUp

  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1291 on: September 27, 2021, 12:40:45 AM »
The press liked the game because its a really good game. And we all know Era would all be loving it if it was a permanent Sony exclusive.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1292 on: September 27, 2021, 12:46:47 AM »
"Drive-by" is their traffic violation giving the moderators "probable cause" to ban you for contempt of cop.

remy

  • my hog is small but it is mighty
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1293 on: September 27, 2021, 12:56:20 AM »
Glad to see Crossing Eden made some time out of his busy schedule of astroturfing to write multiple diatribes on why Bayonetta Needs To Fuck Like In The Last Of Us in the slut shaming thread

fucking bizarre

 I don't even know where to begin about how deranged this rant is. Maybe the part where he post pictures of a fully clothed Bayonetta and claims that it horribly objectifies her
He got banned for it lmao.

hope it was worth it  :lol

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1294 on: September 27, 2021, 01:16:06 AM »
Quote from: JayC3 ADMIN, post: 74118810, member: 2194
We don't like to make a habit of putting former staff in the spotlight when they're actively being targeted by hate groups, so we're only going to address this once: Before this site existed Morrigan used to be critical of Islam in the same way she was critical of Christianity, from a feminist point of view. Since then she's gained a much greater understanding of intersectionality and Islam today, and has understood for years now that Islam deserves more sensitivity because of how Muslims are marginalized in the west. Muslim staff who actually worked with her were consulted about this and made it clear that they did not believe she was Islamophobic or biased in her moderation.

This is something we've received questions about privately in the past and have always been happy to answer. It's not lost on us that the people going after her now have never bothered to bring it up with us before. At any rate, she's no longer on staff and this isn't a topic that we're going to dwell on.
Why is it staff saying this? Why is not Morrigan explaining herself and apologizing? Shouldn't we be leaving the decision as to whether or not she's off the hook for her rampant bigotry up to the marginalized members who were harmed, driven away, etc. due to it? Why should we believe that this specific yt can change and has seen the light on Islam when not on other religions which she continues to condemn? Why are these "Muslim staff" not standing up for Morrigan and never have before? Why does staff refuse to name or even action the "hate groups" supposedly targeting Morrigan by criticizing her for her bigotry?

Since when have staff made it clear that bringing up issues with staff leads to anything except threads locked, bans issued and concerns dismissed?

What other common user would be granted such broad protections (by staff no less!) if accused of bigotry, with recipes, by random members?

Thank you for your time.

Averon

  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1295 on: September 27, 2021, 01:16:47 AM »
Crossing Eden really comes off as a weirdo that's trying way too hard, like he's trying to compensate for something he'd done and is ashamed of. He comes across as another Amir0x in that regard. 
« Last Edit: September 27, 2021, 02:20:53 AM by Averon »

Hap Shaughnessy

  • Canadian Ambassador to Guam (Ret.)
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1296 on: September 27, 2021, 01:18:27 AM »
Anybody post this yet?
https://www.resetera.com/threads/fuck-it-i%E2%80%99ll-take-the-ban-admins-seriously-both-siding-pseudoscience-in-the-middle-of-a-pandemic.492006/

Quote
User banned (1 week) and threadmaking privileges revoked: Hostility and creating a reaction thread
Quote from: ekgrey
this is beyond embarrassing. tolerance doesn’t mean tolerating bullshit snake oil when people are dying every godsdamned day because they’re overdosing on fucking snake oil! facts matter, science matters. the truth matters.

we’ve seen the evidence every day since 2016, but especially in the last 18 months.

tolerance of willful, prideful ignorance is begging for a fate even worse than we’re clawing our way up from now.

no, ripping someone apart because of their spirituality is not cool and plenty of nonsense is harmless. but plenty is poison!

if we as a community aren’t even allowed to discuss how harmful and backwards some of what passes as “belief” is these days, then i don’t want to be a part of this community.

edit: posted a reply but context
Post in thread 'I'm pretty baffled by how mainstream astrology etc. has become'
https://www.resetera.com/threads/im-pretty-baffled-by-how-mainstream-astrology-etc-has-become.491449/page-11#post-74147547

sorry for assuming everyone is as bored as me this sunday and scrolling through every first page.
:salute

AliceAmber strikes again. And yes, astrology is stupid.
OBE

Taco Bell Tower

  • Your likes are brought to you by YUM! Brands
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1297 on: September 27, 2021, 02:12:40 AM »
Quote
Javier23 said:
The thread set out to discuss Spotify being disabled while playing Death Stranding, and we are now inferring on page 3 that Kojima is a sociopath that is toxic to those around him. Man, fuck off, people like you make the Internet a really weird place sometimes.

Quote
Nostremitus said:
No, folks who ignore red flags because they like products, companies, and creators are actively keeping the internet weird.

Like seriously, who in their right mind would even consider disabling Spotify? I could give a fuck about Spotify, but like, what mentality leads someone to that decision? To even go down the line of thought that leads to that decision?

https://www.resetera.com/threads/so-apparently-its-not-possible-to-listen-to-spotify-while-playing-death-stranding-why-what-does-that-accomplish.491667/page-3#post-74120616

Potato

  • Senior's Member
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1298 on: September 27, 2021, 02:41:48 AM »
Quote from: JayC3 ADMIN, post: 74118810, member: 2194
We don't like to make a habit of putting former staff in the spotlight when they're actively being targeted by hate groups, so we're only going to address this once: Before this site existed Morrigan used to be critical of Islam in the same way she was critical of Christianity, from a feminist point of view. Since then she's gained a much greater understanding of intersectionality and Islam today, and has understood for years now that Islam deserves more sensitivity because of how Muslims are marginalized in the west. Muslim staff who actually worked with her were consulted about this and made it clear that they did not believe she was Islamophobic or biased in her moderation.

This is something we've received questions about privately in the past and have always been happy to answer. It's not lost on us that the people going after her now have never bothered to bring it up with us before. At any rate, she's no longer on staff and this isn't a topic that we're going to dwell on.
Why is it staff saying this? Why is not Morrigan explaining herself and apologizing? Shouldn't we be leaving the decision as to whether or not she's off the hook for her rampant bigotry up to the marginalized members who were harmed, driven away, etc. due to it? Why should we believe that this specific yt can change and has seen the light on Islam when not on other religions which she continues to condemn? Why are these "Muslim staff" not standing up for Morrigan and never have before? Why does staff refuse to name or even action the "hate groups" supposedly targeting Morrigan by criticizing her for her bigotry?

Since when have staff made it clear that bringing up issues with staff leads to anything except threads locked, bans issued and concerns dismissed?

What other common user would be granted such broad protections (by staff no less!) if accused of bigotry, with recipes, by random members?

Thank you for your time.

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.

« Last Edit: September 27, 2021, 02:47:43 AM by Potato »
Spud

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1299 on: September 27, 2021, 03:08:36 AM »
There was a post in the astrology thread where someone was illustrating how astrological beliefs harms understanding of astronomy which leads to all kinds of other kooky beliefs about planets and such. Funny how a single (1) admin can't handle that discussion.


benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1301 on: September 27, 2021, 03:20:23 AM »
User Banned: (3 days) Hostility towards another member.
Quote from: bluexy, "Freelance Games Journalist"
At this point, there's really no reason not to support Epic Games. It thought Apple was doing something illegal. It took Apple to court over it. It mostly lost. It complied with the court's demands. Now, Apple has refused to do what it said in court that it would do, which is reinstate Epic's developer account and get Fortnite back on the App Store once Epic was following the rules. It's really that simple now.
You should rethink calling yourself a journalist if you posted this unironically.
Epic willingly broke the contract and got banned in the process. Apple said that they will allow them back on the store once the lawsuit is over and Epic decided to appeal, which means they extended their ban. They didn’t follow the rules, they broke them again.
I like how people were equally harsh on bluexy for being totally wrong about the court outcome and saying "there's no reason not to support Epic" but this is the only guy they ban because he called into question bluexy's self-proclaimed journalist credentials.

Don Rumata

  • Hard To Be A John
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1302 on: September 27, 2021, 03:46:10 AM »
Dragon dildo collection > Crystals collection.

Potato

  • Senior's Member
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1303 on: September 27, 2021, 04:02:32 AM »
User Banned: (3 days) Hostility towards another member.
Quote from: bluexy, "Freelance Games Journalist"
At this point, there's really no reason not to support Epic Games. It thought Apple was doing something illegal. It took Apple to court over it. It mostly lost. It complied with the court's demands. Now, Apple has refused to do what it said in court that it would do, which is reinstate Epic's developer account and get Fortnite back on the App Store once Epic was following the rules. It's really that simple now.
You should rethink calling yourself a journalist if you posted this unironically.
Epic willingly broke the contract and got banned in the process. Apple said that they will allow them back on the store once the lawsuit is over and Epic decided to appeal, which means they extended their ban. They didn’t follow the rules, they broke them again.
I like how people were equally harsh on bluexy for being totally wrong about the court outcome and saying "there's no reason not to support Epic" but this is the only guy they ban because he called into question bluexy's self-proclaimed journalist credentials.
Most freelance games journalists take the FREE part too literally and don't get paid, which means they're not really journalists, but simply hobbyists. The quality of their "work" reflects this.
Spud

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1304 on: September 27, 2021, 04:03:12 AM »
Sorry, wasn't gaslighting essentially an obscure term almost nobody used for most of its life, until it exploded in popularity and became an actually commonly-used phrase once people broadened application beyond "manipulating to an institutionalization-worthy level of mental instability"? Was there ever a period where women at large felt a deep and emotional connection to the phrase or is this just more bullshit using women to justify stupid policy.

I think I posted the etymology of the phrase in here before, because I am also annoyed that a specific psychological experience and term describing it has just become "well, I had a different experience", but it was fairly well known as its based on a film and play from... the 40s? about a man trying to psychologically destroy his wife through doing various shit then denying anything had happened to make her question her own sanity.

It'd be like if someone said a woman was trying to Gone Girl a man today; its actually a pretty specific cultural reference to a specific kind of action, and if you claimed you were being "Gone Girled" because you forgot your wife said she was eating dinner with a friend and was late getting home you kind of missed the fucking point.

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1305 on: September 27, 2021, 04:04:09 AM »
So are era just getting ready to transition into an anti-vaxx site, because god bless the little minorities that can't handle criticism or rationality?

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1306 on: September 27, 2021, 04:29:45 AM »
As pointed out a fundamental point of gaslighting is that the victim begins to doubt themselves in multiple ways and then ultimately their own view of reality. None of these people are being gaslighted because they basically never believe what the person is saying in the first place.

The major gaslighting being done on ResetERA.com is the roving mob assertation that nobody can ever in good faith have alternative viewpoints from them. They almost always jump to assuming bad faith rather than honest disagreement. Look at that Girlfriend Reviews thread, it's not honest disagreement by individuals over whether or not it's racist, just shitty, just a bad joke, or whatever, you have prominent posters literally writing fan fiction about how "they're white so they expect to get praise for pissing on a black man" along with outright rage at not the GF Reviews guy but non-specific whites. The standard demands for posters who disagree to sit down and shut up, etc. This is a component of gaslighting where you cannot challenge the narrative so you just accept it to avoid punishment.

Run this procedure enough times and is it any wonder that ResetERA.com's views find themselves antagonistically perpendicular to almost any other selected sub group and that they break down in confusion when they visit Twitter, reddit or any other site that doesn't impose a sitewide set of truths.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1307 on: September 27, 2021, 04:39:38 AM »
how many times can Weltall Zero get banned:
User banned (2 weeks): Inflammatory comparison
Quote
Couldn't you say "but the people at x studio worked so hard on x game" in response to just about any controversy
"The engineers at Lockheed worked so hard on these anti personnel mines! How could you boycott them?".
And that's from a forum that hasn't even played his game, unlike The Bire!

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1308 on: September 27, 2021, 04:47:35 AM »
That gaslighting comment is actual insanity.  I would bet the VAST majority of the women on the site are ignorant to the history behind it and just take it to mean what it means in general vernacular (which at this point is really just "lying").  You know, like most words that slowly change throughout history because language evolves.

Also, what happened with that dude revealing Snormy to be a shared mod account? Anything come of that?

Maybe I misunderstand the term myself, but isn't 'gaslighting' essentially a infantile way to say emotional manipulation? in the same way that toxic has come to mean 'opinions that I don't like'?

(Nintex tucker meme this one pls)



So true :trumps
🤴

NekoFever

  • Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1309 on: September 27, 2021, 06:01:51 AM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/what-do-you-think-about-the-explosion-of-healing-crystals-should-society-be-worried-about-the-rise-of-pseudoscientific-alternative-medicine.201756/page-4#post-33604527

They used to be able to handle it

You can remove the subject from this response and it becomes impossible to tell which of those threads it’s from:

Quote
Idk, on the one hand I think it's dumb bullshit, on the other hand [removed] is primarily popular with women and LBGTQ people and thus shitting on it too hard seems wrong considering why some people may be turning to it given their experiences in society at large and with the medical community in particular.

Taco Bell Tower

  • Your likes are brought to you by YUM! Brands
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1310 on: September 27, 2021, 06:31:46 AM »
Quote
I was definitely throwing a side-eye to streamers rocking back and forth on neon yellow Cyberpunk chairs while

Begging for a Cyberpunk chair I see.   :marimo

https://www.resetera.com/threads/streamers-posting-sponsored-content-for-problematic-companies.491233/page-2#post-74051731

Averon

  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1311 on: September 27, 2021, 07:03:28 AM »
-side-eye
-bad faith
-sensitive thread
-prior history
-cancel culture doesn't exist
-JAQing off
-milkshake duck
-male gaze
-alt-right chuds
-punch a Nazi
-GamerGate
-dismissing concerns
-account in junior phase
-low post count
-"gamers"
-hostility
-yt

Is there any other annoying ERA vernacular I'm missing?

remy

  • my hog is small but it is mighty
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1312 on: September 27, 2021, 07:06:40 AM »
weltall and crossing eden both banned? forum might be bearable for once

Transhuman

  • youtu.be/KCVCmGPgJS0
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1313 on: September 27, 2021, 07:19:16 AM »
Is there any other annoying ERA vernacular I'm missing?

Inflammatory comparison
Concern trolling

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1314 on: September 27, 2021, 07:26:28 AM »
sus

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1315 on: September 27, 2021, 07:28:22 AM »
Now the concerns are sensitive:
User banned (3 weeks): Dismissing sensitive concerns, prior relevant infractions

Sorry I don’t see why this would make him controversial. Cause most churches would be considered anti-LGB in your country anyway and he didn’t say anything controversial. Plus I don’t see any general backlash from people world wide

Averon

  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1316 on: September 27, 2021, 07:37:41 AM »
"prior relevant infractions" = prior history

What's the point of renaming it?

Averon

  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1317 on: September 27, 2021, 07:40:04 AM »
Oh, man how could I forget "cacs." It even pre-dates "yt" if I'm not mistaken.

Pissy F Benny

  • Is down with the sickness
  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1318 on: September 27, 2021, 07:42:02 AM »
some autisty needs to do glossary of era mod jargon :brain
(ice)

Snoopycat_

  • Senior Member
Re: Off-Site Discussion: Inappropriate Use of Another Member's Moderation History
« Reply #1319 on: September 27, 2021, 07:44:42 AM »
Now the concerns are sensitive:
User banned (3 weeks): Dismissing sensitive concerns, prior relevant infractions

Sorry I don’t see why this would make him controversial. Cause most churches would be considered anti-LGB in your country anyway and he didn’t say anything controversial. Plus I don’t see any general backlash from people world wide

Ree - Cancel culture doesn't exist!!!

Ree - We should try to get this guy fired from his job for being a conservative and going to church.